|
O) Data Analysis Process
|
|
Construct
Validity
-Convergent Validity -Discriminating Validity
|
|
P) Results
|
|
- Result on Average Variance
Extracted (AVE)
1) Normative Pressure = 0.46
2) Mimetic Pressure= 0.68
3) Structural Social Capital = 0.70
4) Operational Performance =0.65
5) Coercive Pressure= 0.59
6) Top Management Support = 0.70
7) Green Supply Chain Management = 0.68
8) Cognitive Social Capital = 0.70
9) Relational Social Capital =0.66
10) Environent Performance =0.65
- Result on Hypothesis
1) Strong support for H1b and H1c, while H1a was not
supported.
2) Strong support to H2
3) Strong support for H3a, H3b, and H3c.
4) Strong support forr H4a and H4c, while H4b was not
supported.
5) Strong suppor for H5a and H5c, while H5c was not
supported..
|
|
Q) Fundamental Findings
|
|
-Describes the relationship
between the environment and the operations that do not show significant
relationships.
-Some studies give no
positive response between environmental and operational performance.
-Environmental expansion can
increase performance delivery or reduce cost of goods
.
|
THEORY ARE STUDYING THE IMPACT OF INSTITUTION PRESSURE ON GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND FIRM PERFORMANCE A) Issue or Problem of the Study - Firms need to respond towards green practices issue. B) Research Question -If there is impact on institutional pressures like government, customer, and competitor pressures? -If there is relationship between the environmental and operational performance on Green Supply Chain Management? -If top management roles needed in Green Supply Chain Management? C) Research Objectives - Validate theoretical framework with an empirical study -To find managerial recommendations which has great national and global manufacturing industry like Korea. - To highlight further research opportunities in the area of green practices especially for whole supply chain management. D) Significance of The Study -To expand green supply chain management by strengthening g...
Comments
Post a Comment